Home Blog Page 8

Rupee edges 2 paise lower to close at 83.34 on FII outflows

0
Rupee edges 2 paise lower to close at 83.34 on FII outflows

The rupee slipped by 2 paise to settle at 83.34 (provisional) against the US dollar on Thursday due to FII outflows and weak local equities.

Oil prices sliding more than 1 per cent and the US currency trading lower against its major global rivals restricted the rupee’s fall, forex dealers said.

At the interbank foreign exchange market, the local unit opened higher at 83.30 against the US dollar. It later moved in a tight range of 83.29 to 83.36 in the day trade.

The rupee finally closed lower by 2 paise at 83.34. The unit had closed at 83.32 on Wednesday.

The dollar index, which gauges the greenback’s strength against a basket of six currencies, was trading 0.31 per cent down at 103.60.

The greenback had strengthened on Wednesday after the Fed meeting minutes suggested a hawkish tone of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).

Brent crude futures, the global oil benchmark, fell 1.45 per cent to $80.77 per barrel.

On the domestic equity market front, Sensex slipped by 5.43 points or 0.01 per cent to close at 66,017.81 points. The Nifty50 declined 9.85 points or 0.05 per cent to settle at 19,802.

Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) were net sellers in the capital markets on Wednesday as they sold shares worth ₹306.56 crore, according to exchange data.

EU lawmakers back rules directing big tech to tackle child sexual abuse online

0
EU lawmakers back rules directing big tech to tackle child sexual abuse online

Serghei Turcanu/iStock via Getty Images

EU lawmakers have agreed to draft rules requiring Alphabet’s unit (GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) Google, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and other online service providers, to detect and remove online child pornography, noting that end-to-end encryption would not be affected, Reuters reported.

The draft

Programmatic Advertising: Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms…

0
Programmatic Advertising: Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms…

Martech Outlook | Monday, November 20, 2023

Programmatic Advertising: Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms…

Despite its relative youth, programmatic advertising is already revolutionizing digital marketing by offering improved efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and targeting capabilities never before possible.

FREMONT, CA: Programmatic Advertising revolutionizes digital marketing by leveraging algorithms to automate the buying and selling of ad space. This innovative approach, commonly associated with real-time bidding (RTB), enables advertisers to purchase and place ads on websites and apps more efficiently and effectively.

Traditionally, advertisers would engage in time-consuming negotiations and manual processes to secure ad space, often resulting in overspending. However, programmatic ad buying streamlines this procedure through software automation. Advertisers can define their target audience and budget, leaving the software to handle the rest. Real-time bidding, the predominant method within programmatic advertising, employs an auction-based system where advertisers bid on real-time ad impressions. The highest bidder wins the opportunity to display their ad to the user. Alternatively, although less common, private marketplace deals involve direct negotiations between the publisher and advertiser, bypassing the auction process. Programmatic advertising relies on the technique of machine learning, in which computers have the ability to learn from data without being explicitly programmed. Machine learning algorithms are crucial for deciding which ads to display when to display them, and the appropriate pricing. Programmatic ads heavily rely on machine learning to operate effectively.

Machine learning plays a significant role in programmatic advertising by analyzing data and identifying patterns in user behavior. By scrutinizing this data, predictions can be made regarding users’ future actions. For instance, if a user has recently searched for “running shoes” on Google, they are likely interested in purchasing running shoes. Advertisers can utilize this customer data to display relevant ads for running shoes when the user visits other websites. Additionally, machine learning algorithms predict the likelihood of potential customers engaging in desired actions, such as clicking on specific Google Ads or purchasing. This information allows advertisers to determine which ads are more likely to succeed, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively.

Optimizing bid amounts is a critical decision in programmatic advertising. Bidding too low diminishes the chances of ad display while bidding too high results in unnecessary expenditure. Machine learning excels in this domain by leveraging its capability to analyze big data and predict outcomes. By evaluating user behavior and historical campaign data, machine learning algorithms can estimate the likelihood of a user clicking on an ad and generate an optimal bid amount.

Machine learning is instrumental in continually refining programmatic campaigns. By analyzing metrics from past campaigns, machine learning algorithms can identify effective targeting strategies, successful ad content, and campaign targets. This invaluable information enables advertisers to optimize future campaigns, significantly increasing their chances of success.

Programmatic advertising is a transformative approach to digital marketing that utilizes algorithms to automate the buying and selling of ad space. Machine learning plays a vital role in programmatic advertising, as it enables the analysis of user behavior, prediction of user actions, optimization of bid amounts, and continuous improvement of campaign results. By harnessing the power of machine learning, advertisers can achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and success in their programmatic advertising endeavors.

3 Auto Stocks to Buy to Defend Your Portfolio

0
3 Auto Stocks to Buy to Defend Your Portfolio

With robust demand for new vehicles, a growing transition to EVs globally, and the integration of advanced technology, the auto industry is well-poised for significant growth and expansion. Given the industry tailwinds, it could be wise to invest in fundamentally sound auto stocks Genuine Parts (GPC), Nissan (NSANY), and Miller Industries (MLR) for a resilient portfolio. Keep reading….

Given sustained demand for new and used automobiles, the widespread adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs), and increased technology integration, the auto industry’s long-term outlook appears promising. Hence, quality auto stocks Genuine Parts Company (GPC), Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (NSANY), and Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) could be ideal additions to your portfolio.

The U.S. auto industry continued to ride the recovery wave in the third quarter of 2023 on pent-up demand and improving inventory levels. According to a forecast released by Cox Automotive, new vehicle sales in the third quarter are expected to exceed 3.9 million, up more than 15% from the same period last year.

“As the first three quarters of 2023 come to a close, “pleasantly surprised’ may be the sentiment of many auto analysts,” said Cox Automotive Senior Economist Charlie Chesbrough.

“The market has faced high interest rates, real affordability issues, and ongoing inflation, which could have led to large declines in vehicle sales. However, pent-up demand has been fueling the vehicle market this year. Consumers, and even more so large fleets, have become buyers as inventory improves. Year-over-year sales gains have been surprising indeed,” Chesbrough added.

In addition, the growing demand for electric and hybrid automobiles worldwide would propel the industry’s growth. As per a report by Fortune Business Insights, the global EV market is expected to reach $1.58 trillion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 17.8% during the forecast period.

According to Statista, revenue in the U.S. electric vehicles market is projected to reach $161.60 billion by 2028, exhibiting a CAGR of 18.2% from 2023 to 2028.

Further, the global auto parts market is projected to reach $755 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 7.5%. The rising demand for new and used vehicles, the continued growth in aftermarket sales, the growing adoption of EVs worldwide, and the extensive integration of advanced technology are key factors bolstering the auto parts industry’s expansion.

Considering the industry’s bright prospects, investing in fundamentally strong auto stocks GPC, NSANY, and MLR could be wise.

Let’s discuss the fundamentals of these stocks in detail:

Genuine Parts Company (GPC)

GPC distributes and sells automotive replacement parts, and industrial parts and related materials. The company operates through two segments: Automotive Parts Group and Industrial Parts Group.

On August 1, GPC announced an acquisition of its European Automotive business, expanding its leadership position in Spain. Effective July 31, London, United Kingdom-based Alliance Automotive Group (AAG) acquired Recambios y Accesorios Gaudi, S.L.

“We are pleased to expand our European Automotive footprint with the addition of Gaudi,” said GPC’s Chairman and CEO Paul Donahue. “With this acquisition, we are broadening our leadership position in Spain, Europe’s fifth largest automotive market, while extending the opportunities for rollout of the NAPA brand and enhancing the profitability of our European business.”

GPC’s net sales increased 2.6% year-over-year to $5.82 billion in the third quarter ended September 30, 2023. Its gross profit grew 6.5% from the year-ago value to $2.11 billion. Its adjusted net income rose 10.7% from the prior year’s quarter to $351.20 million, and its adjusted EPS came in at $2.49, an increase of 11.7% year-over-year.

The company updated its full-year 2023 guidance previously provided in its earnings release on July 20, 2023. GPC reaffirmed revenue growth of 4% to 6%, and it expects cash from operations in the range of $1.30 billion to $1.40 billion. The company updated EPS to $9.20 to $9.30, compared to the previous guidance of $9.15 to $9.30.

Analysts expect GPC’s revenue and EPS for the fiscal year (ending December 2023) to increase 4.9% and 11.2% year-over-year to $23.19 billion and $9.27, respectively. Also, the company surpassed the consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, which is impressive.

For the fiscal year 2024, the company’s revenue and EPS are estimated to grow 4.1% and 6.7% from the prior year to $24.13 billion and $9.89, respectively.

The stock has gained 6.9% over the past month to close the last trading session at $137.47.

GPC’s robust outlook is reflected in its POWR Ratings. The stock has an overall rating of B, which translates to a Buy in our proprietary rating system. The POWR Ratings are calculated by considering 118 different factors, each weighted to an optimal degree.

The stock has a B grade for Quality. Within the A-rated Auto Parts industry, GPC is ranked #14 of 61 stocks.

Click here to access additional ratings of GPC for Growth, Value, Momentum, Stability, and Sentiment.

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (NSANY)

NSANY, headquartered in Yokohama, Japan, manufactures and sells vehicles and automotive parts globally. The company markets and sells its vehicles under the Nissan and Infiniti brands. In addition, it offers financial services, card business, auto credit and car leasing, insurance agency, and inventory finance.

On November 7, Nissan celebrated its 23rd anniversary in Brazil while preparing to begin a new chapter in the company’s history in Brazil and South America, aligned with its global Ambition 2030 plan.

During the ceremony held at its Resende Industrial Complex, NSANY announced its 2023-25 investment plan expansion, reaching R$2.8 billion ($573.52 million) and confirmed the production of two new SUVs (Sports Utility Vehicles) and a turbo engine. Nissan’s new investment strengthens the company’s strategy in the local market and across South America.

For the first half that ended September 30, 2023, NSANY’s net sales grew 30.1% year-over-year to ¥6.06 trillion ($40.76 billion). The company’s operating income increased 115% from the year-ago value to ¥336.74 billion ($2.26 billion). Its net income attributable to owners of parent rose 359.4% from the prior year’s quarter to ¥296.21 billion ($1.99 billion).

Furthermore, the company’s earnings per share for the six months came in at ¥75.64, an increase of 359.3% year-over-year.

Nissan revised upward its fiscal 2023 full-year forecast, reflecting expectations of further improvements in global retail sales (excluding China) and favorable foreign exchange benefits during the first half of 2023. The revised forecast suggests a ¥400 billion ($2.69 billion) upward adjustment in net revenue and a ¥70 billion ($470.83 million) increase in operating profit.

In addition, NSANY’s net profit is anticipated to grow by ¥50 billion ($336.31 million) to ¥390 billion ($2.62 billion) for the full year.

Analysts expect NSANY’s revenue for the fiscal year (ending March 2024) to increase 283.6% year-over-year to $86.16 billion. The company’s EPS for the current year is expected to grow 87.2% from the prior year to $1.58. Moreover, it has topped the consensus revenue estimates in each of the trailing four quarters.

Over the past six months, NSANY’s stock has gained 7.2% and 25.6% year-to-date to close the last trading session at $7.89.

NSANY’s POWR Ratings reflect bright prospects. The stock has an overall grade of B, translating to a Buy in our proprietary rating system.

NSANY has an A grade for Growth. The stock has a B grade for Value and Stability. It is ranked #19 among 52 stocks within the B-rated Auto & Vehicle Manufacturers industry.

To see the other ratings of NSANY for Momentum, Sentiment, and Quality, click here.Top of Form

Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR)

MLR manufactures and sells towing and recovery equipment. The company provides wreckers used to recover and tow disabled vehicles and other equipment and car carriers. It markets its products under the Century, Challenger, Vulcan, Holmes, Champion, Titan, Chevron, Jige, and Boniface brands.

On May 31, MLR announced the acquisition of Southern Hydraulic Cylinder, Inc., a custom hydraulic cylinder manufacturer. This strategic acquisition will help boost the company’s efforts to improve the stability of its supply chain and is anticipated to be accretive within the first year.

During the third quarter that ended on September 30, 2023, MLR’s sales increased 33.6% year-over-year to $274.57 million, while its gross profit grew 84.9% from the year-ago value to $42.87 million. The company’s income before income taxes was $22.03, compared to $6.80 million in the prior year’s quarter.

Additionally, the company’s net income was $17.46 million, or $1.52 per common share, compared to $5.23 million, or $1.52 per common share a year earlier, respectively.

Shares of MLR have surged 41.2% over the past nine months and 47.4% over the past year to close the last trading session at $39.76.

MLR’s sound fundamentals are reflected in its POWR Ratings. The stock has an overall rating of B, which translates to a Buy in our proprietary rating system.

MLR has an A grade for Growth and a B grade for Sentiment. It is ranked #11 out of 61 stocks in the A-rated Auto Parts industry.

In addition to the POWR Ratings we’ve stated above, we also have MLR ratings for Value, Momentum, Stability, and Quality. Get all MLR ratings here.

What To Do Next?

Get your hands on this special report with 3 low priced companies with tremendous upside potential even in today’s volatile markets:

3 Stocks to DOUBLE This Year >


GPC shares were unchanged in premarket trading Wednesday. Year-to-date, GPC has declined -19.31%, versus a 19.84% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.


About the Author: Mangeet Kaur Bouns

Mangeet’s keen interest in the stock market led her to become an investment researcher and financial journalist. Using her fundamental approach to analyzing stocks, Mangeet’s looks to help retail investors understand the underlying factors before making investment decisions.

More…

The post 3 Auto Stocks to Buy to Defend Your Portfolio appeared first on StockNews.com

Can Disney solve its Marvel problem with lessons from the past?

0
Can Disney solve its Marvel problem with lessons from the past?

Disney’s new film The Marvels turned in its second straight dismal box-office performance this weekend, taking in a mere $10.2 million. That was a 78% drop from its already-unimpressive opening-weekend haul of $46 million, and means The Marvels—which is a sequel to Captain Marvel, which earned more than $1 billion worldwide in 2019—now has the worst first and second weekends in the history of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Some of that is undoubtedly a function of the film itself, which got mixed reviews and a low grade of “B” in Cinemascore’s audience survey. But the movie’s failure is also  symptomatic of deeper problems with the way Disney has handled the MCU in recent years.

Between 2008 (when the first MCU film, Iron Man, premiered) through 2019, when the so-called Infinity Saga wrapped up, Marvel released 23 movies (roughly two a year), almost all of which got good critical notices and did well—often exceptionally well—at the box office. Of the 24 movies released in that stretch, nine earned more than $1 billion at the global box office. 

In the past three years alone, by contrast, Marvel has released 18 movies and streaming shows. And while it’s had its share of big successes—including the second Dr. Strange film, Wakanda Forever, and Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3—that flood of new content has led to a much lower hit rate: Marvel has had only one movie since 2021 hit the billion-dollar mark, and two of the three films it’s put out this year—Ant Man and the Wasp: Quantumania and now The Marvels—have flopped. And new Marvel releases simply don’t generate the kind of buzz they once did.

The core problem for Disney is simple: it’s produced too much Marvel content. That’s happened for a couple of reasons: Disney wanted to cash in on the MCU’s popularity when it was at its peak, and Disney CEO Bob Iger’s decision to go all-in on streaming with Disney+ (which debuted in 2019, just as the Infinity Saga was ending) meant that it needed to generate more original content for the service. The resulting flood of Marvel movies and shows has devalued the brand and made each individual product seem less distinctive and compelling. 

Just as important, producing so much content makes it hard to maintain a high level of quality, both in terms of subject matter (The Marvels, after all, features 2nd- or 3rd-tier heroes that many casual moviegoers have never heard of) and in terms of the actual productions themselves. It’s no coincidence, for instance, that the only three Marvel movies with Cinemascore ratings of “B” have been released in the last two years, or that those same three films—The Eternals, Quantumania, and The Marvels—got the worst Rotten Tomatoes scores in Marvel history. 

All of this might have been OK if, as part of ramping up the number of shows and movies it was doing, Disney had been scaling back its production budgets. But there’s been no evidence of that—the budget for The Marvels was, depending on who you believe, somewhere between $220 million and $275 million. Disney is still spending lavishly, but getting much less than it did in the heyday of the Infinity Saga. 

It’s not surprising that Disney fell into the overproduction trap: It’s in the business of monetizing intellectual property, and the MCU is one of the most valuable intellectual properties out there. But what’s interesting about Disney’s strategy with Marvel is that it’s exactly the opposite of what the company used to do with its classic animated films, like Snow White, Bambi, and Pinocchio. With only a couple of exceptions (Dumbo and Alice in Wonderland), Disney did not license those movies to TV networks. Instead, it hid them away in the vault, periodically rereleasing them in theaters during special engagements. 

Disney wanted to maintain the mystique that surrounded those movies (and the mystique of the Disney brand itself), and didn’t want to risk devaluing them by making them easily accessible. In fact, even when home video came along, it took a lot to convince Disney that it made more economic sense to sell videocassettes of these films rather than to keep releasing them in theaters every so often. (They’re now available on-demand on its streaming service.)

Old Disney arguably went too far in the direction of zealously guarding its brand, but Disney today has done with Marvel precisely what the old hands were worried about: familiarity is breeding a kind of indifference among many viewers.

On top of that, Marvel itself can testify to the damage that overproduction can create. In the mid-1980s/early 1990s, there was a huge comic-book boom, which became a bubble. There were concrete reasons for the boom, most notably a spike in the quality and seriousness of comic-book writing and art in the 1980s, which got people to pay more attention to the genre, and a big influx of serious collectors, who bid up the prices of not just old but also even relatively new comics.

The result was a huge rise in demand, which the industry met by massively expanding the number of copies it printed of each title and massively expanding the number of new titles it was producing. That, in turn, predictably led to the market being oversaturated, which led to consumer exhaustion. In 1993, the comic-book market crashed, and in many ways never truly recovered. 

It is, of course, hard not to try to milk successful a IP for all its worth as quickly as you can, particularly when you feel as if shareholders are breathing down your neck. And Disney has also been trying to feed the streaming maw, which seems to perpetually require new content. But in doing so, it’s eroding the sense of Marvel films as distinctive and special. In that sense, what Marvel’s troubles are telling us is that the old Disney approach was onto something: Even in an age of instant gratification, less is sometimes more.

A Day to Celebrate and Support Local Entrepreneurs

0
A Day to Celebrate and Support Local Entrepreneurs

As the holiday season approaches, Isabel Casillas Guzman, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator, calls on Americans to participate in Small Business Saturday on November 25. This day, falling just after Thanksgiving is not just a shopping event but a celebration of the 33 million small businesses that form the backbone of local communities nationwide.

“Small businesses are the heart and soul of our neighborhoods, powering local economies and strengthening communities,” Guzman emphasized. Her message resonates with the spirit of entrepreneurship and community support that Small Business Saturday embodies.

Initiated by American Express in 2010 and cosponsored by the SBA since 2011, this day is dedicated to supporting local small businesses that create jobs, boost the economy, and enrich neighborhoods. Last year, a record high of approximately $17.9 billion was spent at independent retailers and restaurants on this day, according to the American Express 2022 Small Business Saturday Consumer Insights Survey.

The significance of Small Business Saturday extends beyond mere numbers. It’s a day that puts a spotlight on the diversity of small businesses and their contribution to the economic and social fabric of communities. The day encourages shoppers to think locally and acknowledge the impact of their spending on their own neighborhoods.

President Biden’s economic agenda, Investing in America, has also played a crucial role in bolstering the small business sector. Since the President took office, there have been 14 million new small business applications, underscoring a historic boom in entrepreneurship in the United States.

Small Business Saturday 2023 is more than just a shopping day; it’s a symbol of resilience and unity. It offers an opportunity for consumers to show their support for the small businesses that have been essential in driving the nation’s economic growth.

Image: Depositphotos


Should Suppliers Cooperate with Companies Entering Bankruptcy?

0
Should Suppliers Cooperate with Companies Entering Bankruptcy?

After a company petitions for bankruptcy, its attention often shifts toward debt providers (e.g., banks) and away from suppliers — unsecured creditors who are not viewed as a primary provider of corporate debt. New research cautions against such shift in attention. How the buyer behaves toward its suppliers and how the suppliers reciprocate the buyer’s behavior determine whether — and if yes, when — the buyer emerges from bankruptcy, a mutually beneficial outcome.

In July 2023, 362 U.S. companies petitioned for reorganization bankruptcy — a number that has been steadily increasing, perhaps indicating slowing economic growth. In choosing to reorganize their debt and emerge from bankruptcy, rather than liquidate their assets and go out of business, these companies seek a new beginning. Successful and prompt emergence from bankruptcy (collectively referred to as bankruptcy survival) are consequential for the company’s stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, customers, and the community. For example, by one estimate, a bankruptcy-survived company, on average, supports 28,000 jobs and adds $1.75 billion to the gross domestic product.


CMF Power 65W GaN Review: Best travel companion

0
CMF Power 65W GaN Review: Best travel companion

CMF, an affordable sub-brand by London-based electronics device manufacturer Nothing, recently launched three products – Power 65W GaN, Watch Pro and Buds Pro. Here we are going to review the Power 65W GaN charging adaptor that comes with multiple ports. According to the company, the charger is compatible with PD3.0, QC4.0+/3.0/2.0, SCP, FCP, PPS, AFC, Apple 2.4A, Samsung 9V2A, and enabled devices including laptops and smartphones. According to the company, it also supports a wide voltage range of 100-240V and 65-watt ultra-fast charging. Do these features make the CMF Power 65W GaN one of the most suitable charging adaptors? Find out in our review.

CMF Power 65W GaN: Price

The charger is currently available in two colours – Dark Grey and Orange. This multiport adaptor is officially priced at Rs 2,999.

CMF Power 65W GaN: Design

This two-pin adaptor features a simple and sleek design made of polycarbonate. In terms of dimensions, it is 56.6mm in length, 55mm in width and 30mm in height along with a weight of 150.7 grams. Also, it offers three ports – USB-A and two ports of USB-C (C1 and C2)

CMF Power 65W GaN: Safety features

The company claims that this adaptor comes with multiple security features and can easily handle overheating, excessive currents, high voltage and low voltage.

CMF Power 65W GaN Test

We used this adaptor to charge several devices, including smartphones and laptops.

Smartphone: I charged a smartphone, that supported 68W fast charging, using the CMF Power 65W GaN adaptor. During the test, it took around 40 minutes to charge the device from five per cent to 100 per cent. However, the charger provided along with the smartphone took around 50 minutes to juice up the device from 0 to 100 per cent. Also, I noticed minor heating issues in the adaptor during the charging.

Laptop: I charged an HP Pavilion 14 laptop (in sleep mode) using a Type-C to Type-C cable through C1. It took around 1 hour and 40 minutes to fully charge the laptop from zero. The HP 65-watt charger, provided with the laptop, too took the same amount of time to fully charge the device.

CMF Power 65W GaN: Port Power Distribution

Even though this device features triple ports, the power output is different in all of them. Here are the details of the power distribution

When using a single port:

  • USB-A: 36 watts
  • USB-C1: 65 watts
  • USB-C2: 65 watts

When using two ports simultaneously:

  • USB-C1 and USB-C2: 45 watts and 20 watts, respectively
  • USB-A and USB-C1: 18 watts and 45 watts, respectively
  • USB-A and USB-C2: 7.5 watts for both ports

When using each port simultaneously:

  • USB-A and USB-C2: 7.5 watts for both ports
  • USB-C1: 45 watts

CMF Power 65W GaN: Verdict

The CMF Power 65W GaN is a great choice for a travel charger. It can charge multiple devices simultaneously. It also supports a wide range of fast charging protocols, so you can quickly charge your devices.

Apple faces complaint from US labor board over benefits for union workers

0
Apple faces complaint from US labor board over benefits for union workers

AleksandarNakic

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) is facing charges from the federal labor board after it allegedly excluded unionized retail workers from a benefits boost in 2022, Bloomberg News reported.

A National Labor Relations Board regional director filed a complaint on Tuesday based on

Why digital marketing should be done in-house – News

0
Why digital marketing should be done in-house – News

Published: Wed 22 Nov 2023, 11:04 AM

Digital marketing is fundamental for every business, but hiring a full-time in-house team of digital marketers can be expensive. Large corporations have the budget for that, but small and medium-sized businesses might not be able to cover a full team and instead, use outsourced services.

Outsourced digital marketing has gotten a bad rap over the years, and it’s not all fair.

In fact, there are many benefits to hiring an external marketing team. It’s usually cheaper, and you can get access to a wide variety of talent spread out across the world. However, there are also several drawbacks that make in-house marketing teams superior.

If you’ve been thinking about outsourcing your digital marketing needs, or you’ve been trying to come up with a good reason to hire an in-house team, here’s why digital marketing is better executed in-house.

Faster turnaround times

When your marketing duties are executed by your in-house team, they’ll prioritise tasks based on your marketing plan. If they get bogged down, you can still outsource individual tasks to an agency or freelancer, but you never have to worry about a third-party agency postponing your needs because they have other clients to manage.

Keeping things in-house is something many industries do, even fleet maintenance is done in-house to avoid the markups and slow turnaround from relying on repair shops.

In-house teams know your products or services better

Knowing your market is the heart of success, but you also need to know your products or services inside and out to sell them to your market.

For example, say you sell a coffee maker that can control how much water you use for the brew cycle, even if the reserve tank is full. This feature might not seem important overall, but if you’re marketing to baristas or people who are serious about their coffee, this feature could be what gets them to buy your coffee maker over others.

If you hand your digital marketing duties to an outsourced team, they might not even realise your coffee maker has a feature to control the amount of water used during the brewing cycle. And unless they have experience in the coffee industry, they wouldn’t even know why this would be important.

The bottom line is that an external team won’t be completely familiar with your product even after you brief them. Your team knows your products better than anyone, and when you have an in-house team, they’ll catch all the nuances that others leave behind.

Outsourcing to improve efficiency might be a myth

Many businesses say they outsource digital marketing to improve efficiency, but it’s worth considering that outsourcing might actually make you less efficient. For example, you’ll have to spend a lot of time upfront defining your business goals and making sure the company you’ve chosen is reliable and has the proper experience.

If you’re heavily regulated, you’ll need to do extra research to make sure the company is familiar with all applicable marketing regulations.

If efficiency is defined as getting things done quickly and smoothly, without much resistance along the way, then obstacles to communication can put a damper on that really fast. For instance, communicating live may require you to take Zoom calls at three in the morning because you’re in different time zones. It’s harder to collaborate when your team isn’t readily available during normal business hours. No matter how great your project management app is, you still need to collaborate live.

When you outsource your digital marketing, you’ll also be collaborating with people who might not speak your language and there might be cultural misunderstandings. These issues can decrease overall efficiency and lead to failed expectations, incomplete work, and missed deadlines.

You don’t really know what you’re getting when you outsource

The final concern with outsourcing digital marketing is that you really can’t know what you’re getting. Businesses can have a wonderful online image with a beautiful website and stories about results they got for clients, but you won’t know if it’s real. It’s also possible the company might be outsourcing your tasks to yet another company without telling you.

Well-established companies with a solid online presence and reputation in multiple spaces are probably a safer bet, but you still don’t know what kind of challenges you’ll face with them.

Digital marketing is best kept in-house

Keeping your company’s digital marketing in-house is a wise choice. Granted, your budget will determine whether that’s possible. However, if you want to grow your business, it’s worth sourcing the extra capital to hire an in-house team of marketing experts because that’s exactly what you need to improve your bottom line.

Ammar Tarique is a business journalist.

Keep This Cracker gears up for Christmas with support from Business Growth Hub

0
Keep This Cracker gears up for Christmas with support from Business Growth Hub

A Salford-based company that creates reusable crackers is enjoying the benefits of support from GM Business Growth Hub ahead of its busiest time of year.

Keep This Cracker was founded by Bea Thackeray in 2013 with the ambition of creating Christmas crackers that could be kept and reused to minimise waste.

With an estimated 100 million crackers pulled in the UK every year, that is enough to reach the North Pole eight times if laid end-to-end.

“My thinking was on how to create that product and to make it something people will want to use and keep,” said Bea. “I decided to do some product trials and tests to see whether it was something I could get manufactured at a larger scale here in the UK. That’s really where the idea came from.

“And then at one point I thought, now I need to go full time and give this a go. I’m tackling this from so many different angles. They come flat packed, which means that the packaging is minimal. The packaging is alsocompostable and reusable, you can store them away after you’ve used them back into the packaging. And one of the main advantages is you can put your own gifts inside. I’ve got customers that are telling me they’re still using them five years on.”

During the pandemic, Bea started to access support through webinars, before signing up for the EnterprisingYou programme through the Hub, and benefitting from support from experienced eco-innovation specialists.

She said: “It really helped having the initial assessment of where are my strengths are, and where are my weaknesses are. We identified a lot of inefficiencies in my business and I needed to streamline a lot of the operations.

“My business adviser on EnterprisingYou was great. He put me in touch with the departments I needed to speak to within the Business Growth Hub, such as the Eco Innovations team, which is how I ended up on Eco-FORCE workshops.

“From there I completed the Journey to Net Zero programme as well, which was fantastic because I’ve learnt how to write an environmental policy statement and put a plan in place. it’s been great learning curve.

“I’ve had a lot of advice from the Digital Innovation team. My brand new website went live in August. The team have helped with fine tuning and I have now added a trade shop where B2B customers can order direct. It’s been great to have that level of support.”

Bea’s plans for the future include expansion in 2024, supplying the hospitality industry and developing the corporate gifting side of the business which will give the product more exposure – as well as taking on additional staff or using third party resources to help with her production.

Yvonne Sampson, Head of Enterprise at GM Business Growth Hub, said: “Small businesses like Keep This Cracker have such an important role to play in our journey to net zero.

“They have the innovative ideas and drive to create products that will help us all reduce our own carbon footprints, so we are thrilled to help Bea continue to grow her business and get her crackers on more and more tables for many Christmases to come.”

EU widens scope of food delivery cartel concerns probe

0
EU widens scope of food delivery cartel concerns probe

European Union antitrust regulators have carried out another series of raids on two online food delivery companies headquartered inside the bloc.

The Commission hasn’t named the companies involved but the move follows unannounced EU inspections back in July 2022 — which were reported to have taken place at the offices of Spain’s Glovo and German’s Delivery Hero. The two companies later confirmed the inspections.

Last year the EU said its actions were linked to concerns over potential breaches of competition laws against forming cartels and other restrictive business practices. The latest inspections are a continuation of that 2022 investigation, per the Commission, which said the scope of the probe has widened.

“The scope of the investigation, initially including alleged market allocations, has now been extended to cover additional conduct in the form of alleged no-poach agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information,” it said in a press release.

Glovo, and its parent company Delivery Hero, were contacted for comment.

Berlin-based Delivery Hero was founded back in 2011, and now has operations in some 70+ countries globally — operating under a number of different food delivery and quick commerce brands, including several picked up by acquisition. The latter includes Barcelona-based Glovo, a delivey app and q-commerce platform with a food focus, which was founded in 2014 but joined Delivery Hero at the back end of 2021.

While this is the second batch of unannounced inspections on the two food delivery firms the Commission’s PR emphasizes such raids are “a preliminary step toward investigating suspected anticompetitive practices”. “The fact that the Commission carries out such inspections does not mean that the companies are guilty of anti-competitive behaviour nor does it prejudge the outcome of the investigation itself,” it adds.

There’s no set legal deadline for completing investigations of anticompetitive conduct. So it’s unclear when the investigation might wind up — nor what outcome it could have. Although it’s notable the Commission has expanded the scope of what it’s looking into.

The EU runs a leniency program for infringing companies that choose to cooperate with cartel investigations. It also provides a whistle-blower tool where individuals and companies can report antitrust violations on an anonymous basis.